Author Topic: Michael on submissive Kings  (Read 3051 times)

Betty

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Michael on submissive Kings
« on: September 27, 2011, 04:50:00 PM »
MOST ORDINAL ROLES CAN BE BACKED INTO A CORNER BY ANY EXALTED ROLE WHETHER OR NOT THE GOAL IS DOMINANT.  EVEN DOMINANT WARRIORS CAN BE DOMINATED BY ACCEPTING OR SUBMITTING KINGS.  [Acceptance and Submission being the most passive goals.]  THERE IS SOMETHING PATHETIC ABOUT A KING IN RETARDATION.  IT REMINDS ONE OF A PEACOCK WHO HAS BEEN IN A HAILSTORM.

I was reading the original transcripts and came upon these very evocative sentences.  I don't remember reading this in the MFM book(s).  It struck me as funny, and I had to laugh out loud.

SomeOldSoul

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: Michael on submissive Kings
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2011, 01:22:19 AM »
I don't recall it being in any Michael material I've read.  And I laughed out loud too, a rarity.

Velleity

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
Re: Michael on submissive Kings
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2011, 09:17:50 AM »

Funny! ;D

I don't know if my lowly stagnation (of flow) ever backed a blusteringly hard warrior art tutor of mine into a corner...
Though I did make him tear up and nearly outright cry when I failed the class. lol.  ::)

Betty

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Michael on submissive Kings
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2011, 04:42:38 PM »
Quote
Though I did make him tear up and nearly outright cry when I failed the class. lol.

Good enough!   ;D