Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Betty

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
King / Magnetic Kings
« on: May 17, 2011, 04:11:51 PM »
Can someone tell me:  do all Kings become magnetic Kings at some point, or is it only some of them?

Essence Twins / Re: he said i didn't have one
« on: May 17, 2011, 04:08:34 PM »
The only problem with that, as I and many others have learned, is that it must be reciprocal.  Otherwise, you are just setting yourself up to be taken advantage of.  Unfortunate, but true, at least in the world as it is today.

Essence Twins / Re: he said i didn't have one
« on: May 16, 2011, 05:21:07 PM »
I don't know if that's the reason for your feeling or not.  But I do have an ET, and I've always felt very alone.

Essence Twins / Re: he said i didn't have one
« on: May 15, 2011, 05:18:12 PM »
Yeah, I had the same question a while back....

MFM says that essence twin are the same role, but, apparently, several other sources say they are usually different roles, and the consensus seems to be that majority opinion rules.  So MFM is considered to be in error because it is the minority opinion now.

The Roles (or Soul Types) / Re: POLL: What is Your Role?
« on: May 13, 2011, 01:54:38 PM »
Wow, this poll is really skewed from the general public.  Servers are the most common, but in here, I'm the only one.  And what's with so many kings?

General Discussion / Re: My Michael Chart
« on: May 02, 2011, 03:01:13 AM »
Oh, okay :D

I like that


The special benefit of the MT for me has been to validate the feelings and questions I've been struggling with all my life.  There was always a sprinkling of self-doubt; i.e., am I crazy for feeling this way?  When I discovered MT back in the day, it was a liberating feeling of relief.  Recently getting my overleaves channeled was another welcome sense of validation and knowledge.

It has also helped me make sense of some of the things that have happened in my life.

Suggestions/Help / Re: Page Numbers
« on: May 01, 2011, 07:38:45 PM »
Good point, Drury.  I hadn't thought of that, but I see where it could easily happen.

Past Lives & Reincarnation / Re: Cycles, Ages & Levels
« on: May 01, 2011, 02:15:18 AM »
Johndalf, you say "I, personally, am in lifetime number 454 of 3 chronoconsecutive Cycles at 7th Level Mature, herenow, thiswhen."

I'm not sure what you mean.  Do you mean that in this cycle you are in life 454, or do you mean that in 3 cycles, you are in life 454?  Or do you mean something entirely different?

I guess it would help if I asked what chronoconsecutive cycles are   :)   

Suggestions/Help / Re: Page Numbers
« on: May 01, 2011, 02:04:40 AM »
Never mind about the page numbers; I see where it's already done.   ::)

Suggestions/Help / Page Numbers
« on: May 01, 2011, 12:52:49 AM »
Is there any way you can put the page numbers at the top as well as at the bottom?  Also, I think the "like" or "dislike" button is a very good idea.

General Discussion / Re: My Michael Chart
« on: May 01, 2011, 12:39:34 AM »
What does HTH stand for?

General Discussion / Re: My Michael Chart
« on: April 30, 2011, 06:46:44 PM »
Thank you for actually discussing my question, instead of flat-out telling me I'm wrong and accusing me of dogma.

One thing I would like to point out if that I never said MFM was right and everybody else was wrong.  I simply asked where they got their information.   Validating was all I was trying to do--of both MFM and "other channels".  Instead I got accused of dogma.  Although I fail to understand how questioning leads to dogma. 

Boy, just asking questions here can get one attacked!  And thank you, Chiara, for the sarcastic reply.  I will endeavor to remember that one should not question the knowledge or sources of certain people.

General Discussion / Re: My Michael Chart
« on: April 30, 2011, 02:49:10 PM »
Chiara, I'm just trying to validate.  A lot of your posts could be taken the wrong way, too.

John, I'm not a stickler for proper terminology, so I'm not going to get into semantics game with you.  That's your thing, not mine.  Although you haven't produced any evidence, either--a "lot" of channeling experience is hardly definitive either way any more than my "cherry-picked" example.

I was just trying to understand why the original channeling was declared inaccurate.  However, I will drop it rather than get into an argument with the both of you, who seem to be sure that you are correct and I am wrong.

General Discussion / Re: My Michael Chart
« on: April 30, 2011, 04:32:59 AM »
Quote from John Roth:

"From looking at lots of channeled charts. In channeled charts, Essence twins are very seldom of the same role. Experience trumps dogma every time."

Just to play devil's advocate here:  what you are really saying is that the "lots of channeled charts" are experience, and the MFM channeling is dogma.

In other words, you (and others) have made a choice on what to believe.  That's fine, but calling the original channeling dogma is a little too much, I think.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6