1
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: September 29, 2012, 04:18:10 AM »
causal*
News:
Looking for the MFM Study Group? You must be registered and logged in to read it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
General Discussion / Re: Michael Transcripts - Public Domain ~ May 5, 2012
« on: May 06, 2012, 08:55:11 PM »
this is incredible. Thanks for posting it!
3
Channeling / Random channelings from what I assume is Michael
« on: February 17, 2012, 07:25:56 AM »
Here is a small collection of randoms channelings I recently received from what I'm assuming is Michael. I suggest you use judgement when reading, as not 100% convinced I'm channeling very accurately.
Could the Michael foresee aliens coming to our planet soon? We can foresee that indeed aliens have been interested in coming to your planet as of lately, we don't however see them coming any time soon. We would make the prediction that its possible within the next 10 years that your specie will be at that point where aliens visitors could gracefully be welcomed, but until then, it just isn't within any agenda for contact to be made with human and alien species. It would upset too many of your religious fundamentalist and alike. Once turmoil amongst arid nations ceases and composure about new life being on the planet is brought to bare, aliens will gladly introduce themselves.
Would Michael comment on Houdini's and Jim Diamond's ability to dematerialize and materialize? Is it accurate? We will inform you that, yes dematerialization and re-materialization is possible and that more human fragments will and have successfully done so. The process to do such involves stilling the mind to such a degree it can transmigrate the atomic structure of the body and rehash the body at another location within the time space continuum. To explain any in detail will take a lot of effort and time to carefully delineate the process in linguistical format. Just know the process of such feats done by those fragments was carefully done over extended amounts of time and would take considerable perseverance and patience to perform accurately. That is to say it's a time consuming ordeal to promulgate hence why so few accurately do the process.
Could Michael please comment on the effects of Marijuana, what its good for? And should it ultimately be used? We will attempt to provide insight into the matter of cannabis consumption as you desire, keep in mind we are by no way "telling you what to do" or attempting at altering your mind, but merely laying out objective information on the matter. We will begin by saying that yes Cannabis dose have benefits but the risks of long term effects are also high, by long term effects we mean undesirable and potentially hazardous to the human body. What Cannabis ultimately does is alter neurological components in the brain to withstand more influence by the subconscious mind and alike. We will state that because of these effects, it allows the fragment to experience a wide array of "colorful" sequences that lay impressions in your waking conscious life. Because of this effect, fragments enjoy the more mundanity of existence on the physical plane. However with the consumption of cannabis over extended periods, the body literal begins to mutate its symbiotic structure in such a way that it begins to significantly alter the mind's ability to think, do, and react. It's because of these detrimental effects, that we suggest it shouldn't ultimately be used. However we will again reiterate for you that we by no means are "telling you what to do" and the choice is ultimately yours to continue consuming it, but from our consultation we wouldn't condone the matter.
Could the Michael foresee aliens coming to our planet soon? We can foresee that indeed aliens have been interested in coming to your planet as of lately, we don't however see them coming any time soon. We would make the prediction that its possible within the next 10 years that your specie will be at that point where aliens visitors could gracefully be welcomed, but until then, it just isn't within any agenda for contact to be made with human and alien species. It would upset too many of your religious fundamentalist and alike. Once turmoil amongst arid nations ceases and composure about new life being on the planet is brought to bare, aliens will gladly introduce themselves.
Would Michael comment on Houdini's and Jim Diamond's ability to dematerialize and materialize? Is it accurate? We will inform you that, yes dematerialization and re-materialization is possible and that more human fragments will and have successfully done so. The process to do such involves stilling the mind to such a degree it can transmigrate the atomic structure of the body and rehash the body at another location within the time space continuum. To explain any in detail will take a lot of effort and time to carefully delineate the process in linguistical format. Just know the process of such feats done by those fragments was carefully done over extended amounts of time and would take considerable perseverance and patience to perform accurately. That is to say it's a time consuming ordeal to promulgate hence why so few accurately do the process.
Could Michael please comment on the effects of Marijuana, what its good for? And should it ultimately be used? We will attempt to provide insight into the matter of cannabis consumption as you desire, keep in mind we are by no way "telling you what to do" or attempting at altering your mind, but merely laying out objective information on the matter. We will begin by saying that yes Cannabis dose have benefits but the risks of long term effects are also high, by long term effects we mean undesirable and potentially hazardous to the human body. What Cannabis ultimately does is alter neurological components in the brain to withstand more influence by the subconscious mind and alike. We will state that because of these effects, it allows the fragment to experience a wide array of "colorful" sequences that lay impressions in your waking conscious life. Because of this effect, fragments enjoy the more mundanity of existence on the physical plane. However with the consumption of cannabis over extended periods, the body literal begins to mutate its symbiotic structure in such a way that it begins to significantly alter the mind's ability to think, do, and react. It's because of these detrimental effects, that we suggest it shouldn't ultimately be used. However we will again reiterate for you that we by no means are "telling you what to do" and the choice is ultimately yours to continue consuming it, but from our consultation we wouldn't condone the matter.
4
General Discussion / Re: Cooperation vs. Competition
« on: January 27, 2012, 07:10:02 PM »
Apparently there is two ways to teach and learn, the didactic and the socratic method. The didactic is the one society has adopted as its primary, which is just dispersing the information catalogued in textbooks to students from teachers with the intention that the student will remember everything when the situation calls for the information to be provided. The latter being socratic which intends the student to pull the information from within, and disperse it outwardly when the situation calls for it. The teacher then becomes just the one who asks the questions that arises the embodied learner to question content against truth in his own self reality and provide his own answers. It's the only way mastery could exist. No competition, just cooperation is necessary.
5
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: January 27, 2012, 06:49:32 PM »
Personally what has helped me the most, which I'm guessing has influence from the casual plane but still non conclusive, is visualizing every minuscule aspect of the teaching. That i think is whats next. A visual to go with the framework to make the daunting experience of validation a breeze for those less linguistically inclined. Also if we had a physicist that was willing to channel the michael, couldn't we have a more scientific approach towards the theoretical side since they'd be able to use the subconscious of the scientist to maximum benefit?
6
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: January 26, 2012, 07:15:36 PM »
Yeah that sounds more my alley. I was just actually entertaining the thought of making a fictional story that covers the validating process of the teachings. I want to do something innovative and original, and perhaps going Mark Twain on MT could be a successful endeavour. But I wouldn't do it unless I know it would be great and further people along the metaphysical path (Arrogance mixed with Priest and Spiritual attitude?). With the Age of Aquarius in full swing who knows how much metaphysics will blow up in 10 years.
I seem to have a lot of Carndial inspiration energy floating aboot.
I seem to have a lot of Carndial inspiration energy floating aboot.
7
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: January 23, 2012, 02:33:34 AM »
I've pasted the channeling I did on here about the flower of life. Once I knew it took seven circles to complete the entire flower and the pedals all looked their on 3 axises, I figured there is an overall dynamic to the universe that we as a human specie haven't fully understood. I channeled the entity when i primped and primed for it, and got good paragraph or so, disclosing that i wasn't incorrect to assume the pedals makes the axises and the flower is the very dynamic of their teaching. The teachings themselves were meant for not just agape but used to help with all exigencies of life, the flower just being a symbol of the hidden matrix of our cosmos; Inspiration, expression, action and assimilation. Which then they built a template for us to use as a way towards understanding ourselves and the larger picture, since that's what humanity needs most.
It only remains theoretical because well, we have yet to prove it perfect certainty and use it to its fullest potential. That's why we all made agreements with the Michael teachings. To use them, share them, validate them, so as a collective we can slowly fade away the maya on our planet and see what is and whats not. Perhaps right now I'm only on the sharing stage, and starting towards the validation stage. Just recently I got into a conversation about the seven different roles with a couple of folks, and all them right away were curious to know what they were. After briefly going over all of the roles and the principle behind each one, they all right away knew which one they were. I remember going over what an artisan with king casting would act like, and with out a doubt the guy burst out laughing and says "YOU'VE NAILED IT! THATS SO ME!" Thats exactly what i pegged him as from the get go. He was happy, I was happy. Much love to go around.
It only remains theoretical because well, we have yet to prove it perfect certainty and use it to its fullest potential. That's why we all made agreements with the Michael teachings. To use them, share them, validate them, so as a collective we can slowly fade away the maya on our planet and see what is and whats not. Perhaps right now I'm only on the sharing stage, and starting towards the validation stage. Just recently I got into a conversation about the seven different roles with a couple of folks, and all them right away were curious to know what they were. After briefly going over all of the roles and the principle behind each one, they all right away knew which one they were. I remember going over what an artisan with king casting would act like, and with out a doubt the guy burst out laughing and says "YOU'VE NAILED IT! THATS SO ME!" Thats exactly what i pegged him as from the get go. He was happy, I was happy. Much love to go around.
8
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: January 22, 2012, 06:26:28 PM »
I've seen a lot of the ways michael teachings as been packaged, I know and we all know the name is arbitrary, but people without agreements do not unless it's stated right away. The whole metaphysical law of 7 i feel could use a little more clarification to the public. Take a look at the flower of life, and see that its literally the very dynamic of the teaching. One of the most circulated ancient symbols is conveying the "truth" that the michael entity perceives all the same. So it's not just about the michael teachings, its about the information that supports what we already know and how it all comes to together.
Personally I'm still going to continue with trying to disperse the information when appropriate, and I'm still going to share it when everyone i think would be interested. I've already met several people that loved it, and several that thought it didn't exist. What ever. What as already been done, as been done, what hasn't will be whats next in the next wave of publications. More of the teachings is evolving and more information is being provided to give better clarity of how it all "goes down". I'm a communicator to the nth degree, and I will further try to better communicate all that as been provided.
Personally I'm still going to continue with trying to disperse the information when appropriate, and I'm still going to share it when everyone i think would be interested. I've already met several people that loved it, and several that thought it didn't exist. What ever. What as already been done, as been done, what hasn't will be whats next in the next wave of publications. More of the teachings is evolving and more information is being provided to give better clarity of how it all "goes down". I'm a communicator to the nth degree, and I will further try to better communicate all that as been provided.
9
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: January 22, 2012, 02:12:28 AM »
Its not so much evangelizing the teachings as a whole, but producing the information to the masses, so they can benefit the value of learning more about the universe they live in. Its all about finding the common demoninator amongst all "spiritual" teachings, and finding more core truths out. You know we have scientists furthering the evolvement of knowledge and truth by examining the concrete reality around us, michael teachings is merely information categorized into a template that furthers evolvement of our reality of more abstract concepts.
What I'm all about is trying to getting valuable slightly more esoteric knowledge for the masses to indulge in. I don't mean sermonizing the teachings as a religious opportunity towards enlightenment, but merely having the basic core of the teachings presented into simple methods of understanding. If that makes sense. As what Jordan Dutchynz (sp?) did with his spirit science video's, its all about presenting ideas that formulate new age metaphysical truths for the general populace, to get them to have a clearer view and understanding of everything spiritual and mystical as a whole.
Honestly my biggest peeve about the teachings is it's name. I hate using the name Michael, because it almost acts as a repellent as getting those whom don't have agreements with the Michael engaged with the information provided, so they themselves can have stepping stones to jump forward on so to speak when is comes down to thinking about the larger picture and whom they actually are, and why we're here all here. It's like it glamorizes the messenger more then the message with the name Michael before the teaching.
What I'm all about is trying to getting valuable slightly more esoteric knowledge for the masses to indulge in. I don't mean sermonizing the teachings as a religious opportunity towards enlightenment, but merely having the basic core of the teachings presented into simple methods of understanding. If that makes sense. As what Jordan Dutchynz (sp?) did with his spirit science video's, its all about presenting ideas that formulate new age metaphysical truths for the general populace, to get them to have a clearer view and understanding of everything spiritual and mystical as a whole.
Honestly my biggest peeve about the teachings is it's name. I hate using the name Michael, because it almost acts as a repellent as getting those whom don't have agreements with the Michael engaged with the information provided, so they themselves can have stepping stones to jump forward on so to speak when is comes down to thinking about the larger picture and whom they actually are, and why we're here all here. It's like it glamorizes the messenger more then the message with the name Michael before the teaching.
10
Spirituality / Re: Spirit Science.
« on: November 29, 2011, 11:01:47 PM »
Well I've done the liberty of doing it. This is what they said
"Could Michael please address the Flower of Life"...We would be happy to address your comment. It seems that this flower of life is causing a stir on the physical earth at present moment. With more information available then ever before, it's easy to share ideas about the matrixies of life. We will start of by saying that the flower of life is part of the very dynamic of our teachings. You are not incorrect in assuming each pedal is an axis, and all 7 circles complete the grand scheme. It is important however to take into consideration that although, the flower is real, it doesn't however address the issues of living on the physical plane. Our teaching provides assistance into taking the metaphysical law of 7 into other territories that allow fragments to experience the blooming of the flower in all exigencies of life. We hope this answer is what your looking for and will conclude with another fun fact that if you expand your circles, it will never cease to stop and provides the element of the infinity into all life in the known universes. We bid farewell.
"Could Michael please address the Flower of Life"...We would be happy to address your comment. It seems that this flower of life is causing a stir on the physical earth at present moment. With more information available then ever before, it's easy to share ideas about the matrixies of life. We will start of by saying that the flower of life is part of the very dynamic of our teachings. You are not incorrect in assuming each pedal is an axis, and all 7 circles complete the grand scheme. It is important however to take into consideration that although, the flower is real, it doesn't however address the issues of living on the physical plane. Our teaching provides assistance into taking the metaphysical law of 7 into other territories that allow fragments to experience the blooming of the flower in all exigencies of life. We hope this answer is what your looking for and will conclude with another fun fact that if you expand your circles, it will never cease to stop and provides the element of the infinity into all life in the known universes. We bid farewell.
11
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: November 23, 2011, 04:14:06 AM »
Not a red herring at all. It's important to put your thoughts "out there" because of there ability to generate further and boarder pictures to be pondered upon. Sharing what you just said was helpful to me as it give me boarder awareness, aroused mental activity, created a link to a 8th+ dimensional entity home of 1050 individual operating minds to share wisdom, all of which expanded my mind that much further. thank you. 
12
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: November 17, 2011, 11:08:25 PM »QuoteHOW would you describe the michael teachings to a logical left brained scientist?(that's what I'm asking YOU) Why? Well because perhaps if Michael teachings could attract more skeptics, then it there would be a pressure to receive more channeling and further evolve the teachings. Sharing the teachings to a wider audience can only produce more involvement with the Midcasual entity and earth, and giving us more information to make the grand connections between science and spirituality. So absolute truth could be broadly known and clumsy limiting belief structures can be burnt down.
Telling people who are already in agreeable compliance with the teachings doesn't usually ignite constructive skepticism that can improve what already exists. It pressures us to validate it more if there is people demanding more proof.
I simply don't see a point in doing that (telling people who are not clearly open to it/seeking it). If I received information of scientific/techological nature, that I could share in some productive way, I would share it but keep the source to myself, unless I would be sharing with someone who is at least remotely okay with it. I see more value in putting the teaching into practice than preaching it. It's not another Christianity. In my view it is a kind of teaching that people find for themselves, and if they don't, then it's not for them, at least not in an active form.
I HAVE tried to share it with some people, and the above it what I have realised from that experience. Even people who are fully open to the idea of channeling were not attracted to it, at least not the way I am (for example one such person preferred teaching of Veronica Entity and yet another one did her own channeling of some sort of guides). They listened, they asked questions, but that was it. One even looked around michaelteachings.com, and it just was not for her. Whereas when I did that as a newbie, I got hooked.
Michael Teaching IS very much evolving, there is new material still channeled and freely available for study. And it is driven by existing as well as new students (all of whom pretty much find it for themselves, rather than being actively recruited). They ask questions, and that is what drives the evolution of the Teaching.
I do not see what Michael tells us as "absolute truth". And they would not call it that either. If they did, I would immediately view it with suspicion and probably steer clear of it.
I have neither desire nor even a smidgeon of ability to burn somebody else's belief system down, unless they themselves were ready and willing to have it burnt down in the first place (then I can ONLY help). When there is a way, there is a way. When there isn't a way, there isn't a way. My own belief systems are the only ones that are my own business. I can share how I see things, and what others do or believe is up to them.
I for one believe in absolute truths. I believe we can only have one scientific truth, and one spiritual truth. Maybe this is just the priestly part of me, but I want to die knowing that spirituality and science can have a mating relationship with each other AND have offspring known as one reality. What's driven me so far about MT in particular is it's ability to explain a lot about a lot, that's easy to make sense of. MT is pioneering us forward to greater "spiritual" truths that can be backed up by valid claims on our ability to perceive them. [from this point on, I presume this was a guided answer]It's important to remember that the teachings are about agape not right or wrong. Its useless to argue the teachings with those whom deny it. It's up to them to experience them or not. What is Good work however is ones ability to validate the teachings around him/her and then share the insights that they presume to be helpful in aiding restricting blocks. Once again no one is right nor wrong, it's all an experience to excel from. What could be said is that If one were to nudge along hints to a greater picture, then by all means do so, but the intent should not be to save them, but to open their 'eyes' to something different and potentially helpful. [please take note that sometimes as I write forum responses, i get a certain "flow" to which I presume is Michael guiding some of my responses, like the last on the first page about sexuality. I've found out that I do in fact have an Agreement with them which involves sharing/validating/using ect.... which I'm sure a lot of you do as well.]
13
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: November 17, 2011, 07:51:22 AM »Well clearly one wouldn't go stomping around a catholic church with raw new age material to flash around coming from a ouija board, preaching about a better way. Respect for others entitlement to believe what one wishes to believe is an important ethical practice in life and what I would presume Good work to be.QuoteTo whom and how? How is a tricky question needing of a tricky answers. Answers so deep and so mind blowing you mortal punitive mind cannot fathom its complexity. Now with that said, I think its best to just step back from this. Unless of course we just assume people will come around to examining belief structures that venture with reason and beyond mortality. Then we could to nudge them along to a fuller view to which the michael teaching can come walking into the conversations for once at the family dinner.If the family around this hypothetical family dinner table was interested in MT and open to ideas like channeling (and the "why" is that they might find the Michael Teaching of value), then sharing the teaching (if you choose to do so), could be approached quite directly ("how") and one could make an assumption it would be well received and such people are seeking such information.
If this family was not interested in MT, and perhaps quite happy with being, I dont know, Christians, or Atheists, then the "why" has everything to do with the person who wants to share it and their need for support, and nothing to do with the rest of the people around the table. Then it comes to expectations the person places on their family, on asking something from them that they cannot give him/her etc.
HOW would you describe the michael teachings to a logical left brained scientist?(that's what I'm asking YOU) Why? Well because perhaps if Michael teachings could attract more skeptics, then it there would be a pressure to receive more channeling and further evolve the teachings. Sharing the teachings to a wider audience can only produce more involvement with the Midcasual entity and earth, and giving us more information to make the grand connections between science and spirituality. So absolute truth could be broadly known and clumsy limiting belief structures can be burnt down.
Telling people who are already in agreeable compliance with the teachings doesn't usually ignite constructive skepticism that can improve what already exists. It pressures us to validate it more if there is people demanding more proof.
14
General Discussion / Re: How do you go about telling people about the Michael teachings?
« on: November 15, 2011, 07:58:01 AM »
To whom and how? How is a tricky question needing of a tricky answers. Answers so deep and so mind blowing you mortal punitive mind cannot fathom its complexity. Now with that said, I think its best to just step back from this. Unless of course we just assume people will come around to examining belief structures that venture with reason and beyond mortality. Then we could to nudge them along to a fuller view to which the michael teaching can come walking into the conversations for once at the family dinner.
15
Introductions / Re: National Geographic
« on: November 11, 2011, 08:57:20 AM »
I'm from Saskatchewan, CANADA! *shivers*
Pages: [1] 2