31
The Roles (or Soul Types) / Re: What it's like to be a (fill in the role)....
« on: August 26, 2011, 09:12:53 PM »
btw, Betty is my real name; it's not a nickname. 
News:
Looking for the MFM Study Group? You must be registered and logged in to read it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
The Roles (or Soul Types) / Re: What it's like to be a (fill in the role)....
« on: August 26, 2011, 06:00:19 PM »
My name?
No I don't have self-dep. My primary CF is arrogance, my secondary is stubbornness.
I thought I was a server, too (probably because of cultural imprinting), but so many of the things didn't fit me that I had a difficult time with it. However, the sage role (the steadier type, not the "in front of an audience" type) fits me very well.
My cadre/entity is 2/5. My ET is artisan. My TC is a warrior.
No I don't have self-dep. My primary CF is arrogance, my secondary is stubbornness.
I thought I was a server, too (probably because of cultural imprinting), but so many of the things didn't fit me that I had a difficult time with it. However, the sage role (the steadier type, not the "in front of an audience" type) fits me very well.
My cadre/entity is 2/5. My ET is artisan. My TC is a warrior.
33
The Roles (or Soul Types) / Re: What it's like to be a (fill in the role)....
« on: August 26, 2011, 02:27:39 AM »
I just had my profile redone, and it turns out I'm not a Server at all. I'm a King-cast Sage. This actually fits me much better than the server role. And it explains why so many characteristics of a server did not fit me. Go figure.
34
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 25, 2011, 06:08:47 PM »
I wonder if there's a soul age and level that all the fragments have to be in order to participate in a magnetic kingdom. Or maybe a soul age/level range? Anybody know?
35
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 23, 2011, 06:56:16 PM »
lol
after I posted, I started thinking....who says you can't have fun doing your thing...and....a good party does sound like fun
after I posted, I started thinking....who says you can't have fun doing your thing...and....a good party does sound like fun
36
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 23, 2011, 06:22:48 PM »
It does say that because ALL of us eventually crave reunion, it follows that we will eventually find our magnetic King.
Not sure exactly what that means....think it's talking about reuniting.
Not sure exactly what that means....think it's talking about reuniting.
37
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 23, 2011, 05:30:49 PM »
I do think you are kind of misreading this or blocked by your own resistances, but it doesn't really matter. I am just passing on the information I've found because I think it's interesting. If you don't....well, that's your choice.
Although I don't understand what's creepy about any of this. They are compelled only after they have volunteered to be part of their magnetic group, so it's still voluntary.
And I don't believe kings are just there to throw a big party, although if you want to look at it that way, that's your right.
I'm not here to defend, confirm, validate, or reject the information. I'm just passing it along, and each person will handle it however they choose.
Although I don't understand what's creepy about any of this. They are compelled only after they have volunteered to be part of their magnetic group, so it's still voluntary.
And I don't believe kings are just there to throw a big party, although if you want to look at it that way, that's your right.
I'm not here to defend, confirm, validate, or reject the information. I'm just passing it along, and each person will handle it however they choose.
38
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 23, 2011, 12:18:04 PM »
When a King takes on the task of being a Magnetic Old King, it takes on the emphasis of REUNION. Magnetic Old Kings emphasize an effect within their Kingdom of a “final gathering”, or a reunion among the entities of which they have been strongly connected. This Reunion usually has an emphasis, or theme, of experiences that help contribute to that reunion, but regardless of the theme, the end result will be in that of Reunion. Those who are a part of a Magnetic Old King’s Kingdom will then feel compelled upon their own to emphasize a drop in all barriers within their own circle of contact as a means to encourage Reunion. Reunion, then, will be the means through which that Kingdom’s theme is implemented
39
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 23, 2011, 05:10:35 AM »
lol, John
actually, what it says is that each role will have a particular emphasis:
server - comforts
artisan - patronage
warrior - advocacy
scholar - invention
sages - mentoring
priest - transformation
king - reunion
It would interesting to ask Michael about any magnetic groups operating currently.
actually, what it says is that each role will have a particular emphasis:
server - comforts
artisan - patronage
warrior - advocacy
scholar - invention
sages - mentoring
priest - transformation
king - reunion
It would interesting to ask Michael about any magnetic groups operating currently.
40
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 22, 2011, 01:45:46 AM »
Here's what the teachings say (in part):
The entire concept of Kingdoms is based on a VOLUNTARY organization that evolves from a shared realization gained through individual experiences from across several lifetimes and the cohesion to act as a group in implementing a realization.
In highly simplistic explanation: Across your own lifetimes your Personalities and Essence may have noted on several occasions about an experience within the physical plane that you have decided “would be great” if it could be implemented. Eventually a fragment will “announce” to the Energy Ring that it is intending to focus on a specific implementation over time and fragments then “sign up” to be a part of that shared experience of implementation. Fragments who take on the task of leading a Kingdom take several lifetimes to “set the stage” for the eventual emphasis of that Kingdom.
Not all fragments will choose to be a part of a Kingdom. As we said, it is entirely voluntary and simply a means of gaining experience in yet another specific way.
The entire concept of Kingdoms is based on a VOLUNTARY organization that evolves from a shared realization gained through individual experiences from across several lifetimes and the cohesion to act as a group in implementing a realization.
In highly simplistic explanation: Across your own lifetimes your Personalities and Essence may have noted on several occasions about an experience within the physical plane that you have decided “would be great” if it could be implemented. Eventually a fragment will “announce” to the Energy Ring that it is intending to focus on a specific implementation over time and fragments then “sign up” to be a part of that shared experience of implementation. Fragments who take on the task of leading a Kingdom take several lifetimes to “set the stage” for the eventual emphasis of that Kingdom.
Not all fragments will choose to be a part of a Kingdom. As we said, it is entirely voluntary and simply a means of gaining experience in yet another specific way.
41
King / Re: Magnetic Kings
« on: August 21, 2011, 10:24:16 PM »
I read something online in the Michael teacdhings that seemed to indicate that any role could be magnetic in the 6th old. Comments?
43
General Discussion / Re: Why do we have ten fingers?
« on: July 03, 2011, 07:00:01 PM »
All I did was express my opinion. Never said her comment wasn't valid. Never said I had a problem with it.
44
General Discussion / Re: Why do we have ten fingers?
« on: July 02, 2011, 07:05:46 PM »
As far as it being a question for evolutionary biologists, not the MT: well, my opinion is, Dave will delete it if he thinks it is OT. Other than that: if people want to discuss it, that's their choice.
45
General Discussion / Re: Why do we have ten fingers?
« on: July 02, 2011, 07:00:07 PM »
We have 10 because we have 10. Does it really matter?
Or, in other words: Why not have 10? Some number had to be picked/chosen/evolved. If we had a different number--any different number, say 13--people would be asking why we had 13.
Or, in other words: Why not have 10? Some number had to be picked/chosen/evolved. If we had a different number--any different number, say 13--people would be asking why we had 13.